50
/100

SOC 19-1023

Zoologists and Wildlife Biologists

ElevatedFrey/Osborne: 30.0%

Risk Score

โš ๏ธ

50/100

Elevated

US Employment

๐Ÿ‘ฅ

16,920

Total workers

Median Wage

๐Ÿ’ฐ

$73K

$48K โ€“ $113K

Projected Growth

๐Ÿ“ˆ

+1.6%

2023-2033 (BLS)

GenAI Exposure

๐Ÿค–

87/100

High exposure

How we calculate these numbers โ†’

๐Ÿ’ก Zoologists and Wildlife Biologists face a risk score of 50/100 โ€” 6 points above the national average of 44. With 87/100 GenAI exposure, this occupation faces significant pressure from AI tools despite strong projected growth. See our methodology โ†’

๐Ÿ’ก Workers in this field earn $73K ($27K above the national median). The 3 recommended career transitions all maintain competitive wages while reducing automation exposure. Explore transition paths โ†’

๐Ÿ” AI Impact Analysis

With a risk score of 50/100, Zoologists and Wildlife Biologists faces moderate automation pressure. While tasks like robotic sample preparation and experimentation are increasingly handled by AI, the role retains significant human elements. The 16,920 workers in this occupation should focus on strengthening skills in fieldwork in unstructured natural environments and interpreting ambiguous results with domain expertise to stay ahead. The role will likely evolve rather than disappear.

Will AI Replace Zoologists and Wildlife Biologists?

Read our full analysis with verdict, risk factors, safe tasks, and career transition paths โ†’

โš ๏ธ Top Risk Factors

1

Robotic sample preparation and experimentation

2

AI literature review and meta-analysis automation

3

Machine learning models replacing manual hypothesis testing

4

AI-powered research and literature review tools

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Tasks Safe from Automation

โœ“

Fieldwork in unstructured natural environments

โœ“

Interpreting ambiguous results with domain expertise

โœ“

Ethical oversight of research involving human subjects

โœ“

Collaborative scientific discourse and peer review

๐Ÿ“Š Task Automation Breakdown

Based on O*NET task analysis and GenAI exposure scoring. Shows the estimated proportion of this occupation's core tasks that are automatable by current AI, augmented by AI tools, or require essential human skills.

๐Ÿ“‹ O*NET Task Profile

โ€ข

Develop, or make recommendations on, management systems and plans for wildlife populations and habitat, consulting with stakeholders and the public at large to explore options.

โ€ข

Inventory or estimate plant and wildlife populations.

โ€ข

Inform and respond to public regarding wildlife and conservation issues, such as plant identification, hunting ordinances, and nuisance wildlife.

โ€ข

Study animals in their natural habitats, assessing effects of environment and industry on animals, interpreting findings and recommending alternative operating conditions for industry.

โ€ข

Disseminate information by writing reports and scientific papers or journal articles, and by making presentations and giving talks for schools, clubs, interest groups and park interpretive programs.

๐Ÿ’ป Technology Skills

โ€ข

Analytical or scientific software

โ€ข

Office suite software

โ€ข

Data base user interface and query software

โ€ข

Electronic mail software

โ€ข

Geographic information system

๐ŸŽ“ Key Knowledge Areas

โ€ข

Biology

โ€ข

English Language

โ€ข

Customer and Personal Service

โ€ข

Mathematics

โ€ข

Geography

๐Ÿ“Š vs National Average

Median Wage$73K
+$27K

National avg: $46K

Risk Score50/100
+6

National avg: 44/100

GenAI Exposure87/100
+49

National avg: 38/100

Projected Growth1.6%
-2.1%

National avg: 3.7%

๐Ÿ”„ Career Transition Paths

OccupationRiskWageOverlap
Social Scientists and Related Workers21$93K73%
Political Scientists25$139K80%
Occupational Health and Safety Specialists and Technicians26$79K78%